Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 1838.276114 USDT → 1838.374119 USDC — one trade, not 4 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 4 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 2 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x1091f818…c7b2b9 ↗ · block 25,903,456

The whole trade in one view

4 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw4 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −1838.276114 USDTsubject leg
  • +1838.374119 USDCsubject leg
2 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−1838.276114 USDT+1838.374119 USDC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 4 rows become holdings — inventing 2 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−1838.276114 USDT→+1838.374119 USDC1inch v6

One economic event — 2 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.