Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 0.94 ETH → 6345.265650245636354896 CRV — one trade, not 6 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 6 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 4 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x1b641200…8c6395 ↗ · block 26,147,830

The whole trade in one view

6 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw6 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −0.94 ETHsubject leg
  • +6345.265650245636354896 CRVsubject leg
4 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−0.94 ETH+6345.265650245636354896 CRV1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 6 rows become holdings — inventing 4 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−0.94 ETH→+6345.265650245636354896 CRV1inch v6

One economic event — 4 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.