Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 0.041 ETH → 197.984628720695177267 ONDO — one trade, not 4 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 4 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 2 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x29ab07a4…9c1e7a ↗ · block 26,061,156

The whole trade in one view

4 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw4 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −0.041 ETHsubject leg
  • +197.984628720695177267 ONDOsubject leg
2 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−0.041 ETH+197.984628720695177267 ONDO1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 4 rows become holdings — inventing 2 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−0.041 ETH→+197.984628720695177267 ONDO1inch v6

One economic event — 2 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.