Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 1.11581957 YFII → 0.006845321970437447 PAXG — one trade, not 8 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 8 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 6 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x31bb74dd…fd5e16 ↗ · block 25,808,887

The whole trade in one view

8 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw8 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −1.11581957 YFIIsubject leg
  • +0.006845321970437447 PAXGsubject leg
6 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−1.11581957 YFII+0.006845321970437447 PAXG1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 8 rows become holdings — inventing 6 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−1.11581957 YFII→+0.006845321970437447 PAXG1inch v6

One economic event — 6 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.