Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 54696.0006 USDC → 0.68610997 WBTC — one trade, not 15 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 15 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 13 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x31ee033d…e9a65b ↗ · block 25,860,814

The whole trade in one view

15 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw15 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −54696.0006 USDCsubject leg
  • +0.68610997 WBTCsubject leg
13 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−54696.0006 USDC+0.68610997 WBTC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 15 rows become holdings — inventing 13 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−54696.0006 USDC→+0.68610997 WBTC1inch v6

One economic event — 13 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.