Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 500000 HEX → 24664463.337904307939453579 APU — one trade, not 15 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 15 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 13 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x44d51312…86a8e0 ↗ · block 25,830,463

The whole trade in one view

15 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw15 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −500000 HEXsubject leg
  • +24664463.337904307939453579 APUsubject leg
13 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−500000 HEX+24664463.337904307939453579 APU1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 15 rows become holdings — inventing 13 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−500000 HEX→+24664463.337904307939453579 APU1inch v6

One economic event — 13 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.