Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 23.931773 USDT → 8.871914813694253048 DEXE — one trade, not 8 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 8 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 6 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x46f28577…475a9b ↗ · block 25,855,437

The whole trade in one view

8 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw8 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −23.931773 USDTsubject leg
  • +8.871914813694253048 DEXEsubject leg
6 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−23.931773 USDT+8.871914813694253048 DEXE1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 8 rows become holdings — inventing 6 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−23.931773 USDT→+8.871914813694253048 DEXE1inch v6

One economic event — 6 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.