Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 0.014092935628281913 WETH → 25 USDT — one trade, not 2 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 2 ERC-20 Transfer logs. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x59e21bd8…54c2b8 · block 25,465,246

The whole trade in one view

2 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw2 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • 0.014092935628281913 WETHsubject leg
  • +25 USDTsubject leg
resolvedone economic event
0.014092935628281913 WETH+25 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 2 rows become holdings — padding the ledger with legs that aren't positions.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved0.014092935628281913 WETH+25 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.