Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 701.141248349931913594 stETH → 1913946.652526 USDC — one trade, not 21 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 21 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 19 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x5fead0f7…94114c ↗ · block 26,083,090

The whole trade in one view

21 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw21 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −701.141248349931913594 stETHsubject leg
  • +1913946.652526 USDCsubject leg
19 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−701.141248349931913594 stETH+1913946.652526 USDC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 21 rows become holdings — inventing 19 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−701.141248349931913594 stETH→+1913946.652526 USDC1inch v6

One economic event — 19 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.