Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 2341051051.904417258 GINNAN → 52.175982 USDT — one trade, not 8 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 8 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 6 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x61f9ff06…04f990 ↗ · block 25,975,639

The whole trade in one view

8 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw8 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −2341051051.904417258 GINNANsubject leg
  • +52.175982 USDTsubject leg
6 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−2341051051.904417258 GINNAN+52.175982 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 8 rows become holdings — inventing 6 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−2341051051.904417258 GINNAN→+52.175982 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 6 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.