Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 2.22 WETH → 33612.80744257765056107 ENA — one trade, not 14 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 14 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 12 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x6a633207…7a89ac ↗ · block 25,939,332

The whole trade in one view

14 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw14 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −2.22 WETHsubject leg
  • +33612.80744257765056107 ENAsubject leg
12 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−2.22 WETH+33612.80744257765056107 ENA1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 14 rows become holdings — inventing 12 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−2.22 WETH→+33612.80744257765056107 ENA1inch v6

One economic event — 12 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.