Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 4343.80354675 ONDO → 1682.531487 USDT — one trade, not 29 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 29 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 27 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x6dbc6ab7…d02b14 ↗ · block 26,003,876

The whole trade in one view

29 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw29 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −4343.80354675 ONDOsubject leg
  • +1682.531487 USDTsubject leg
27 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−4343.80354675 ONDO+1682.531487 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 29 rows become holdings — inventing 27 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−4343.80354675 ONDO→+1682.531487 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 27 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.