Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 500 USDT → 2898.32228007678375921 pepecoin — one trade, not 19 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 19 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 17 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x6f97eaf9…fc668a ↗ · block 25,823,347

The whole trade in one view

19 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw19 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −500 USDTsubject leg
  • +2898.32228007678375921 pepecoinsubject leg
17 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−500 USDT+2898.32228007678375921 pepecoin1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 19 rows become holdings — inventing 17 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−500 USDT→+2898.32228007678375921 pepecoin1inch v6

One economic event — 17 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.