Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 292.578328 ZAMA → 14.864191 USDC — one trade, not 7 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 7 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 5 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x735491e9…01ec4a ↗ · block 25,867,781

The whole trade in one view

7 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw7 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −292.578328 ZAMAsubject leg
  • +14.864191 USDCsubject leg
5 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−292.578328 ZAMA+14.864191 USDC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 7 rows become holdings — inventing 5 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−292.578328 ZAMA→+14.864191 USDC1inch v6

One economic event — 5 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.