Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 120 USDC → 2781572424.452293969 BAU — one trade, not 6 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 6 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 4 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x75d6f89e…fe8927 ↗ · block 26,083,087

The whole trade in one view

6 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw6 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −120 USDCsubject leg
  • +2781572424.452293969 BAUsubject leg
4 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−120 USDC+2781572424.452293969 BAU1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 6 rows become holdings — inventing 4 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−120 USDC→+2781572424.452293969 BAU1inch v6

One economic event — 4 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.