Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 13934.908830841589481779 GRT → 7015.433586156816564224 WLFI — one trade, not 8 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 8 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 6 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x762b3a08…842a85 ↗ · block 26,090,176

The whole trade in one view

8 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw8 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −13934.908830841589481779 GRTsubject leg
  • +7015.433586156816564224 WLFIsubject leg
6 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−13934.908830841589481779 GRT+7015.433586156816564224 WLFI1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 8 rows become holdings — inventing 6 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−13934.908830841589481779 GRT→+7015.433586156816564224 WLFI1inch v6

One economic event — 6 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.