Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 14910952.6611 FEPE → 202.472347 USDT — one trade, not 7 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 7 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 5 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x7b546de4…0ff4f3 ↗ · block 26,046,923

The whole trade in one view

7 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw7 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −14910952.6611 FEPEsubject leg
  • +202.472347 USDTsubject leg
5 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−14910952.6611 FEPE+202.472347 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 7 rows become holdings — inventing 5 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−14910952.6611 FEPE→+202.472347 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 5 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.