Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 3.802588 PYUSD → 3.802534 USDC — one trade, not 2 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 2 ERC-20 Transfer logs. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x8ccfa746…9cb19e ↗ · block 26,054,129

The whole trade in one view

2 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw2 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −3.802588 PYUSDsubject leg
  • +3.802534 USDCsubject leg
resolvedone economic event
−3.802588 PYUSD+3.802534 USDC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 2 rows become holdings — padding the ledger with legs that aren't positions.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−3.802588 PYUSD→+3.802534 USDC1inch v6

One economic event — no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.