Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 2000 USDT → 243575.576805732235529321 PNK — one trade, not 7 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 7 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 5 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x8dcfefce…f1d07d ↗ · block 26,140,632

The whole trade in one view

7 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw7 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −2000 USDTsubject leg
  • +243575.576805732235529321 PNKsubject leg
5 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−2000 USDT+243575.576805732235529321 PNK1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 7 rows become holdings — inventing 5 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−2000 USDT→+243575.576805732235529321 PNK1inch v6

One economic event — 5 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.