Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 0.01 ETH → 13.060090121384456582 RNDR — one trade, not 3 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 3 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 1 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x94811b48…8aaed8 ↗ · block 26,061,150

The whole trade in one view

3 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw3 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −0.01 ETHsubject leg
  • +13.060090121384456582 RNDRsubject leg
1 routing leg — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−0.01 ETH+13.060090121384456582 RNDR1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 3 rows become holdings — inventing 1 phantom position the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−0.01 ETH→+13.060090121384456582 RNDR1inch v6

One economic event — 1 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.