Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 506 USDT → 6770.367115636119440835 H — one trade, not 5 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 5 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 3 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x9cd208bf…6d321b ↗ · block 25,917,683

The whole trade in one view

5 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw5 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −506 USDTsubject leg
  • +6770.367115636119440835 Hsubject leg
3 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−506 USDT+6770.367115636119440835 H1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 5 rows become holdings — inventing 3 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−506 USDT→+6770.367115636119440835 H1inch v6

One economic event — 3 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.