Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 264.587368 USDC → 264.832719 USDT — one trade, not 10 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 10 ERC-20 Transfer logs 8 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x9ce648b4…e3ce93 · block 25,457,925

The whole trade in one view

10 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw10 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • 264.587368 USDCsubject leg
  • +264.832719 USDTsubject leg
8 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
264.587368 USDC+264.832719 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 10 rows become holdings — inventing 8 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved264.587368 USDC+264.832719 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 8 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.