Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 0.174 ETH → 256368.998874231245083034 ASTEROID — one trade, not 4 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 4 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 2 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0x9ff1db67…d2ae1a ↗ · block 26,003,865

The whole trade in one view

4 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw4 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −0.174 ETHsubject leg
  • +256368.998874231245083034 ASTEROIDsubject leg
2 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−0.174 ETH+256368.998874231245083034 ASTEROID1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 4 rows become holdings — inventing 2 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−0.174 ETH→+256368.998874231245083034 ASTEROID1inch v6

One economic event — 2 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.