Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 337.03731317 LINK → 2305.073837193946382357 ZRO — one trade, not 30 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 30 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 28 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xb0560edf…3e600a ↗ · block 26,111,428

The whole trade in one view

30 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw30 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −337.03731317 LINKsubject leg
  • +2305.073837193946382357 ZROsubject leg
28 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−337.03731317 LINK+2305.073837193946382357 ZRO1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 30 rows become holdings — inventing 28 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−337.03731317 LINK→+2305.073837193946382357 ZRO1inch v6

One economic event — 28 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.