Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 1139.736709917291162835 PENDLE → 2416.700954 USDC — one trade, not 17 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 17 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 15 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xb1aa3b86…f33025 ↗ · block 25,925,310

The whole trade in one view

17 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw17 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −1139.736709917291162835 PENDLEsubject leg
  • +2416.700954 USDCsubject leg
15 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−1139.736709917291162835 PENDLE+2416.700954 USDC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 17 rows become holdings — inventing 15 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−1139.736709917291162835 PENDLE→+2416.700954 USDC1inch v6

One economic event — 15 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.