Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 263.9259 USDC → 264.190463 USDT — one trade, not 11 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 11 ERC-20 Transfer logs 9 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xbeaebb03…b9a613 · block 25,457,934

The whole trade in one view

11 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw11 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • 263.9259 USDCsubject leg
  • +264.190463 USDTsubject leg
9 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
263.9259 USDC+264.190463 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 11 rows become holdings — inventing 9 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved263.9259 USDC+264.190463 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 9 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.