Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 7.404956 USDC → 170.245421151539046909 ZIG — one trade, not 6 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 6 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 4 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xc1729d7c…7f8a4e ↗ · block 26,003,875

The whole trade in one view

6 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw6 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −7.404956 USDCsubject leg
  • +170.245421151539046909 ZIGsubject leg
4 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−7.404956 USDC+170.245421151539046909 ZIG1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 6 rows become holdings — inventing 4 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−7.404956 USDC→+170.245421151539046909 ZIG1inch v6

One economic event — 4 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.