Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 200 INJ → 5.692866192393080673 QNT — one trade, not 14 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 14 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 12 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xc2664ece…b77974 ↗ · block 26,111,413

The whole trade in one view

14 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw14 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −200 INJsubject leg
  • +5.692866192393080673 QNTsubject leg
12 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−200 INJ+5.692866192393080673 QNT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 14 rows become holdings — inventing 12 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−200 INJ→+5.692866192393080673 QNT1inch v6

One economic event — 12 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.