Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 263.266085 USDC → 263.549279 USDT — one trade, not 9 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 9 ERC-20 Transfer logs 7 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xccd5d821…f0cfa9 · block 25,457,935

The whole trade in one view

9 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw9 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • 263.266085 USDCsubject leg
  • +263.549279 USDTsubject leg
7 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
263.266085 USDC+263.549279 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 9 rows become holdings — inventing 7 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved263.266085 USDC+263.549279 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 7 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.