Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 4.643159 USDT → 4906648.102698685334976754 NITRO — one trade, not 6 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 6 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 4 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xcdc62d5e…1057f8 ↗ · block 25,996,826

The whole trade in one view

6 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw6 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −4.643159 USDTsubject leg
  • +4906648.102698685334976754 NITROsubject leg
4 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−4.643159 USDT+4906648.102698685334976754 NITRO1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 6 rows become holdings — inventing 4 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−4.643159 USDT→+4906648.102698685334976754 NITRO1inch v6

One economic event — 4 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.