Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 120 USDT → 120.1245 USDC — one trade, not 13 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 13 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 11 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xd494142b…393787 ↗ · block 25,816,068

The whole trade in one view

13 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw13 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −120 USDTsubject leg
  • +120.1245 USDCsubject leg
11 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−120 USDT+120.1245 USDC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 13 rows become holdings — inventing 11 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−120 USDT→+120.1245 USDC1inch v6

One economic event — 11 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.