Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 0.12472363261447215 ETH → 294.222836 USDC — one trade, not 18 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 18 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 16 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xd597aae9…43cb0e ↗ · block 25,816,066

The whole trade in one view

18 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw18 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −0.12472363261447215 ETHsubject leg
  • +294.222836 USDCsubject leg
16 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−0.12472363261447215 ETH+294.222836 USDC1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 18 rows become holdings — inventing 16 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−0.12472363261447215 ETH→+294.222836 USDC1inch v6

One economic event — 16 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.