Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 22187.247206836905248717 CPOOL → 2.438313521960646873 QNT — one trade, not 12 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 12 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 10 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xda9db3d4…85e9f9 ↗ · block 26,090,175

The whole trade in one view

12 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw12 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −22187.247206836905248717 CPOOLsubject leg
  • +2.438313521960646873 QNTsubject leg
10 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−22187.247206836905248717 CPOOL+2.438313521960646873 QNT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 12 rows become holdings — inventing 10 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−22187.247206836905248717 CPOOL→+2.438313521960646873 QNT1inch v6

One economic event — 10 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.