Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 126455.51703895 AZUR → 93.34378 USDT — one trade, not 7 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 7 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 5 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xe53ba8e2…9fbe4f ↗ · block 25,989,604

The whole trade in one view

7 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw7 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −126455.51703895 AZURsubject leg
  • +93.34378 USDTsubject leg
5 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−126455.51703895 AZUR+93.34378 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 7 rows become holdings — inventing 5 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−126455.51703895 AZUR→+93.34378 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 5 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.