Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 400 USDC → 33.892237888133229149 LINK — one trade, not 8 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 8 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 6 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xf661e9f9…c3491c ↗ · block 25,946,499

The whole trade in one view

8 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw8 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −400 USDCsubject leg
  • +33.892237888133229149 LINKsubject leg
6 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−400 USDC+33.892237888133229149 LINK1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 8 rows become holdings — inventing 6 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−400 USDC→+33.892237888133229149 LINK1inch v6

One economic event — 6 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.