Aggregator swap · 1inch v6

1inch v6 swap: 3750 USDC → 3752.283669 USDT — one trade, not 16 transfers

A real Ethereum mainnet transaction, classified by the same live engine the demo serves. It emitted 16 ERC-20 Transfer logs — 14 of them routing noise through tokens the wallet never held. Intentio collapses that into the one economic event: the conversion you actually made.

0xfc0e9e8e…3464a7 ↗ · block 26,010,961

The whole trade in one view

16 Transfer logs, collapsed to one event.

raw16 ERC-20 Transfer logs
  • −3750 USDCsubject leg
  • +3752.283669 USDTsubject leg
14 routing legs — tokens the wallet never held
resolvedone economic event
−3750 USDC+3752.283669 USDT1inch v6
one conversion · market counterparty · no phantom exposure

Wrong vs. right

What log-only tools book — and what actually happened.

Log-only accounting — two ways to get it wrong

naive AIngest every Transfer: 16 rows become holdings — inventing 14 phantom positions the wallet held for a single block.
naive BOnly the two legs touching the wallet, booked gross — inflating both revenue and expense, and naming the router as the counterparty instead of the market.

Intentio — one conversion, market counterparty

resolved−3750 USDC→+3752.283669 USDT1inch v6

One economic event — 14 routing legs collapsed, no phantom token exposure, an asset conversion (disposal + acquisition), not gross revenue and expense.